The law, with receipts.
AI legal research grounded in EU primary law — GDPR, AI Act, DSA, DMA, NIS2. Every answer cites the exact provision. Try a question below.
Why you can rely on it
Three principles that separate Advoco from a generic AI summary — each demonstrated below, not just asserted.
Grounded or silent
If Advoco can't find primary-law support in the corpus, it won't fabricate one. It will tell you why it can't answer.
This question falls outside the current corpus scope (GDPR, AI Act, DSA, DMA, NIS2). I have no primary-law grounding to answer it. Sign in to see which instruments are in scope.
Text, then synthesis
The verbatim provision is always shown before the paraphrase. You read the law itself — the AI synthesis is the annotation, not the authority.
“The data subject shall have the right to obtain from the controller the erasure of persona…”
In plain terms: you can ask a company to delete your data, and they must act promptly — the supervisory-authority consensus is one month.
Temporal honesty
Every provision carries an in-force date and amendment status. Advoco never answers from a repealed or not-yet-applicable version.
The corpus
MVP coverage: five EU digital and data regulations, English, current-in-force, sourced directly from EUR-Lex.
Personal data rights and obligations for controllers and processors across the EU.
Risk-based framework for AI systems placed on the EU market — from prohibited uses to high-risk conformity requirements.
Layered obligations for online intermediaries, with the heaviest duties on very large platforms.
Contestability and fairness obligations for designated gatekeepers of core platform services.
Cybersecurity risk-management and incident-reporting obligations for essential and important entities.
Start with a question.
Sign in to ask Advoco anything across the full EU digital-law corpus. Every answer cites the exact provision — grounded, verifiable, honest about what it doesn't know.
Sign in with AppleFree to try. No credit card required.